Site Admin
No one logged in. Log in

Transforming Pixels to Gold

Spending too much time looking at screens, a good digital strategy could be about getting everyone some fresh air. And there's some truth in that - because there's nothing appealing about the decomposition process that begins with long hours glued to a chair orchestrating some devious marketing plan to deceive a potential tribe of money throwing masses?

Social Media Marketing - an Economy of Experience?

David Wall - Wednesday, December 09, 2009

Take the "media" out of social media and you're left with the word "social". It's easy to be tangled in metrics about what makes social media successful and overlook that simple point. Facebook and the like suit our present communication needs, so we use it. It works because connecting with people through social media is easy in a time starved and an otherwise disconnected daily existence.

How many of us find emailing someone next to us at work far easier (and quicker) than starting a conversation? It's often much simpler to say happy birthday to a close friend on a social network than sending a (paper) card - great for trees but not so good if you're trying to sell birthday cards…

Have a look at the huge growth rate of social media over the past few years - it takes about 10 seconds to watch the little blue dot representing Facebook.com bubble up and eclipse everything else in its path between 2006-2009. We'd expect a similar trend if the Interaction Consortium did a worldwide piece. The US, for example has internet users checking Facebook every 37 minutes, they post to Flickr 5 times a day, watch YouTube for 2.5 hrs a day and update Twitter every 3 hours… according to Razorfish.

But stats and technology aside, we're still in the realm of social significance. Whether a brand communicates outside or within social media, we need to question: does it provide value or hold any significance in our social exchanges? In other words, will anyone talk about it? Would anyone really care?

A Razorfish survey puts it bluntly: "Consumers don't want conversation with brands - they want deals". We can just as easily say "…they want value". And it's easy to offer value in terms of deals - a discount / a "free coke and fries…" but when a product offers value just with an association to its brand - that's an exchange we're more than willing to pay for.

Speeding down this technological highway we're leaving commodities and services for experiences posts Laurel Papworth. Deals are great but in an "Experiential Economy" they're only as good as the experience we want out of them. Who would go for a 50% or even a 99% discount from a product that has 0% value to us? An experience that no one wants, even for free would have next to no takers (apart from a few freebie hunters).

"The best job in the world" is a prime example of the value of experience. The experience of typing on a keyboard is just that much better from a tropical beach bungalow than a crammed office - even with walls decorated with snow peaked mountains, climbers scaling cliffs, sail boats etc. above words like "leadership", "direction", "motivation" and "Freedom"…

The point is "real" experiences are what makes social waves. If the service or product offered are the best vehicles to these, they'll be big waves!

And the experiences don't even need to be direct - most of the time they're not. It's even easier for a brand to offer experience by association. Like the teenage boy branding himself with his favorite band, absorbing more of the lifestyle and experiences the band promotes the more paraphernalia he buys.

Hear more at Sydney Social Media Marketing 2010 Bootcamp - The Era of Marketing
Learn more from Laurel Papworth,Tourism Queensland Marketing Manager, Robyn Quinn (The best job in the world campaign) and other industry leaders at Sydney Social Media Marketing 2010 Bootcamp – The Era of Marketing

And talking about deals deals deals…
All friends of Photolibrary can take advantage of this special offer: Delegates will be entitled to a 15% DISCOUNT... we all love a good deal!

Posted via email from Transforming pixels to gold

Do ads even need to make sense anymore?

David Wall - Wednesday, December 09, 2009
I don't think they do. Perhaps the more sense they make, the less potential disruption to what's expected occurs - rendering them less noticeable? I'm not actually that moved by the whole disruption strategy of traditional advertising but a disruption to normality - that's artistic. And lets face it advertising has always been tailing art (just to be controversial).

This is not art (by no means...or maybe), not anything grand and it probably makes some sense if you think about it. The great thing though is the idea came to me on the train this morning and with the help of a trusty ex-post production wiz Agus, in no time we whacked up something I'd much rather watch than a commercial...

Posted via email from Transforming pixels to gold

stsooys tbh cya wknd wb??

David Wall - Wednesday, November 11, 2009

I like Bourdieu. First he's got a very French sounding name that gives him instant philosophy street cred (first name is also Pierre) but that's not a good reason to like someone. A better reason is that he's said long ago that the purpose of a lot of what we do or say is to distinguish ourselves from others. We develop strange languages to isolate ourselves from other groups, while hardening the glue within our own group. We create 'secret' codes as a way to know if we're 'in' or 'out'. 

True, he talked about the privileged class trying to keep out the plebs who just don't get things like "high" art  (why wouldn't they get that when you put a urinal in a gallery, it becomes art?) but why not apply this to other tribes like kid's SMS language - what does "stsooys tbh cya wknd wb" mean and if you don't know you were probably born before Netscape was the choice browser.

So people are always going to create new spaces and new languages to distinguish themselves from everybody else and before this space reaches critical mass there's a bunch there already figuring out clever ways to get in and sell a lot of something. This is like adding more oil to the water and bound to disperse the congenial gathering fast - look at what happened to MySpace: more people on it, more marketing budget spent on it = less 'cool' / less the choice online communication platform. 

Now look at the business hype about using Twitter, is that good for Google Wave?

>Should we think less about the technology and more about why we are using it?

www.pixelalchemy.com.au holistic online marketing

Who'd have thought - we're selling to human beings, not robots?

David Wall - Tuesday, November 10, 2009
VW's "Fun Theory" campaign is a good example of clever viral marketing but I don't want to talk about that. You've probably seen and heard this blurb. I think it's worth mentioning the idea behind the claim and what that says about the way people interact with brands.

Firstly, if you haven't seen it yet - check it out:

The implication is that if we lined up 2 equally good products or services the majority would choose one over the other based on fun. Does that mean all products / services need to be fun? 

No, but it's worth looking at the process, the means of getting there (how we learn about the company, when doing the purchasing etc.). The traditional idea preaches the value of "getting in, taking what you need - then getting out" or the quickest, most simplest way for consumers works the best - no holds barred. We're all time starved the argument goes etc.

In reality, we're time starved - yes, but we're also starved of authenticity, we're starved of communication that connects with us on a human level - the sort of communication that says: "hey, you're not just another entry we want to add to our CRM you're someone that appreciates things outside the same old experiences we're used to - here's something fun, something interesting or inspiring - and here it is not because we want to make an extra buck out of it, but we just like it, its fun for us - might be for you too..."

Who'd have thought - we're selling to human beings, not robots?

Posted via email from Transforming pixels to gold

16,000 hits using Google adwords

David Wall - Monday, September 07, 2009
Winning the search game with a lot of hits

I'm just illustration the point with this title on the potential of using the right long-tail keyword even on paid search. I go on about this long-tail stuff all the time because it really is the untapped market that is available to us right now online.

In fact, niche markets as well as keywords will always be here. If you think about how people will always be doing or searching for something new - new and unique terms will always come into play. I guess those who find them first can capitalise on an early advantage... 

But before I get too esoteric, let me get to the point.

The 4 EASY steps, paid-search formula

  1. First focus on just a few good performing long-tail (niche) keywords. In the example below I'm using: "read novels online" (read this to find out how to determine strong long-tail keywords).
  2. Write a Google ad that solves a problem - i.e. the potential customer is usually searching on Google for a solution - bug them with irrelevance and they won't click on your ad!
  3. With a good ad, you'll need to be getting over at least 1.2% click through rate (CTR) for Google to start lowering the cost for each clicks your ad gets (cost per click - CPC). If it's under that change the ad copy or try a different keyword (unless you want to pay Google more than you have to).
  4. Google tells you the adverage daily cost per click - all you need to do is match this by manually capping your CPC everyday. Eventually you can get your keyword down to about 4 - 6 cents (if you're using good long-tail keywords).

So say you had a monthly budget of $1000 - at 6 cents a click if you do this right you'd expect 16,000 targeted visits to your website. This also means that on a small budget, say $15 - expect to get about 200 clicks!

Here's some proof

Check what difference lowering you CPC over a few weeks does to your clicks

The above was a launch campaign for Photos to GO stock photo site. I had a 3k montly budget for a limited time and was using a whole host of keywords - some long-tail others very competitive like "stock photography". On the 2nd month running I had a few competitive keywords dropped to focus on the long-tail words while lowing the cost per click for each. You can see the results - close to 3 times the amount.

Small budget for an up-and-coming author - I got 208 clicks for less than $13

The campaign above was done with 1 keyword only - "read books online". The last I checked that was a hot keyword (a lot of searches and low Google cost). I managed reduce the cost from about 30 cents to 2-3 cents a click with a couple of hundred impressions a day (average over period total was 7 cents). Quite nice when you think I was using a $20 free Google voucher!

Are big brands the new gods?

David Wall - Thursday, August 06, 2009

One of the greatest feats of modern advertising is the ability to seep into every facet of our modern lives, no longer limited to traditional media like television and print, new media is the next frontier, with campaigns reaching deep into the latest tools we use to communicate. Email marketing floods the inbox, Facebook spits out targeted banners and clever viral apps, Twitter is bombarded by promotional "tweets" and soon just walking near a Starbucks will alert us to the free cookie we'll get with every coffee - the delights of GPS and new mobiles phones!

The point is advertising needs to continually re-invent itself to deal with its own self-made enemy: saturation. Futurelab recently presented this succinctly, saying:

People who live near train lines adjust to the noise. They do the same with advertising.Futurelab - Change Marketing
So even the most viral of ads, even the savviest of ad placements have the converse effect of educating us - meaning we get increasingly discerning and harder to convince.

The upside of this downside is we're going to see a lot less of those full-blown "cinematic" production ads - the slick sports car in surreal landscapes, cornering at torque speed; shiny happy people overcoming all obstacles in record time with the help of the gleaming new product.

Why? Because the formula is predictable and fails to convince as it once did - so backed into the corner, good marketing practice becomes more about finding and presenting what's authentic in a brand.

Take for example "content marketing" advocated by marketing expert David Meerman Scott, he throws out the ROI obsessions and aims to build genuine consumer trust. There's no real sales pitch either, it's about educating prospects with relevant, valuable and engaging content.

You've got to think in terms of spreading ideas, not generating leads. A World Wide Rave gets the word out to thousands or even millions of potential customers. But only if you make your content easy to find and consume David Meerman Scott - World Wide Rave

A good example is the recent Razorfish 2009 outlook document - because of its insightful content on digital marketing, it's hit my inbox a few times and if looking to refresh my digital strategies, Razorfish has positioned itself nicely as an authority and without any direct sales pitch (also spreading their message even further right here).

The catch-22 is that today's cynical consumers judge this type of marketing as authentic only when there's no underlying monetary agenda - but isn't ROI and actual sales why we market in the first place? Yes, but more importantly, if our marketing matches our product, there's not need for the marketing veneer - it already is authentic.

Great. But my product isn't cool - What can I do??? - Well, Frankly you're screwed.Futurelab - What's Next In Marketing & Advertising

So, what makes a product cool? If we take Seth Godin's approach - anything that creates meaning, a sense of identity and a connection to others builds a following (a tribe). If the tribe likes it - its cool. The communal spirit of the iPod garbed masses packed into subways and lining our streets is a classic example of how a product became not only cool, but an global phenomenon.

There's a real religious inkling to Godin's ideas on tribes, especially as religion for a lot of people is the ultimate path of seeking connection, authenticity and meaning.

It begs the question: Do brands need to become cultural gods, in order to survive? And if so, are their devotes the ultimate consumers? What are your thoughts...

References

David Meerman ScottWorld Wide Ravehttp://www.worldwiderave.com

FuturelabChange Marketinghttp://www.slideshare.net/Futurelab/change-marketing-v01-1452235

Seth GodinSeth's Bloghttp://sethgodin.typepad.com

Razorfish2009 Digital Outlook Reporthttp://digitaloutlook.razorfish.com/publication/?i=13617

DOUGLAS B. HOLTWhy Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectical Theory of Consumer Culture and Brandinghttp://www.lombard-media.lu/pdf/0308_brands.pdf

Images courtesy of Photolibrary - Get creative with stock photos, stock footage & production music from photolibrary.com